Farmers in rice field in Laos
vegetables at an organic market, Cambodia
Mountain view, northern Laos

The Knowledge Hub on Agroecology in Southeast Asia

A digital gateway to data, information and knowledge on agroecology and food systems transformation in Southeast Asia.

The Regional Hub for Agroecology in the Mekong

The ALISEA Knowledge Hub is the central platform for the agroecological transition in Cambodia, Laos, Vietnam, and Myanmar. We provide a collaborative online library and a network of stakeholders dedicated to climate-resilient farming and food security across the region. Explore our technical resources and regional expertise to support sustainable agriculture from Vientiane to Hanoi.

Latest Insights

All Insights

Latest Library Entries

International, Transdisciplinary, and Ecohealth Action for Sustainable Agriculture in Asia

Sustainably intensifying agriculture to secure food for people, while minimizing the human, animal, and environmental health impacts is an unprecedented global food security challenge. Action research is needed to understand and mitigate impacts, with Ecosystem approaches to health (Ecohealth) emerging as a promising framework to support such efforts. Yet, few have critically examined the application of Ecohealth principles in an agricultural context, particularly in Southeast Asia where agricultural intensification is rapidly expanding. In this paper, we evaluate the strengths, challenges, and opportunities of agriculture-related Ecohealth projects in low-resource settings of Vietnam, Thailand, Indonesia, and China, drawing on a case study of the Field Building Leadership Initiative (FBLI). To do this, we used a developmental evaluation framework involving several iterative cycles of document reviews, interviews, focus groups, and outcome harvesting with researchers, partners, and community members involved in FBLI. Results highlight the importance of transdisciplinarity, participation, and knowledge-to-action principles in co-generating knowledge and co-developing practical solutions. Implementing such principles presents challenges in terms of coordinating regional collaborations, managing high workloads, meaningfully engaging communities, and ensuring ongoing monitoring and evaluation. To address these challenges, there is a need to strengthen capacity in integrated approaches to health, improve institutionalization of Ecohealth, foster community engagement, and systematically monitor and evaluate efforts. Ecohealth holds significant promise in improving food security, but only when considerable time is spent developing and implementing projects with communities.

Impacts of climate change on global agriculture accounting for adaptation

Climate change threatens global food systems1, but the extent to which adaptation will reduce losses remains unknown and controversial2. Even within the well-studied context of US agriculture, some analyses argue that adaptation will be widespread and climate damages small3,4, whereas others conclude that adaptation will be limited and losses severe5,6. Scenario-based analyses indicate that adaptation should have notable consequences on global agricultural productivity7,8,9, but there has been no systematic study of how extensively real-world producers actually adapt at the global scale. Here we empirically estimate the impact of global producer adaptations using longitudinal data on six staple crops spanning 12,658 regions, capturing two-thirds of global crop calories. We estimate that global production declines 5.5 × 1014 kcal annually per 1 °C global mean surface temperature (GMST) rise (120 kcal per person per day or 4.4% of recommended consumption per 1 °C; P < 0.001). We project that adaptation and income growth alleviate 23% of global losses in 2050 and 34% at the end of the century (6% and 12%, respectively; moderate-emissions scenario), but substantial residual losses remain for all staples except rice. In contrast to analyses of other outcomes that project the greatest damages to the global poor10,11, we find that global impacts are dominated by losses to modern-day breadbaskets with favourable climates and limited present adaptation, although losses in low-income regions losses are also substantial. These results indicate a scale of innovation, cropland expansion or further adaptation that might be necessary to ensure food security in a changing climate.

Exploring adaptive spaces towards sustainable rice in Cambodia

Rice is a crucial crop in Cambodia, serving as both a staple food and an export commodity. Promoting rice exports to meet growing international demand is a central policy interest of the Cambodian government, with a target of 1 million tons of rice. However, the intensification of rice production faces multiple environmental and socio-economic challenges. To address these challenges, rice stakeholders have developed incentive mechanisms to promote sustainable practices. Incentive mechanisms refer to the structures or systems designed to motivate individuals or entities to take specific actions or exhibit desired behaviors. In our case, we represent these behaviors as either maintaining existing agroecological practices or changing farming practices towards more sustainable ones. This presentation aims to evaluate the effectiveness of these incentive mechanisms for rice production through a comparative analysis. Our objectives are twofold: 1.To build a framework to analyze incentives to agroecological practices. 2.To test this framework in the case of the rice sector in Cambodia. We analyzed actors-network involved in designing and implementing incentive mechanisms. Drawing on actor-network theory, we used a broad definition of incentive networks and mechanisms, including both human and non-human entities, such as guidelines and farming practices. The incentives function as hubs (or negotiation/adaptation spaces) where social processes and political dynamics take place. Prioritizing connections over individual and isolated factors allowed to better understand power dynamics, which are not inherent to the properties of actors but rather to the relationships established among them. In total, we studied 12 incentives through 17 semi-structured interviews, using an interactive system of actor mapping. Several actors involved in research and development projects, national and international organizations, rice-millers, union of agricultural cooperatives, farmers organizations were interviewed. The comparative analysis of the incentives highlights the differences and similarities of the mechanisms, characterizes their evolution in time and institutional trajectories, turning points in the implementation and the indicators that players use to define their successes or failures. Our findings suggest that the existing economic incentives, in their current shape, are not influencing significant changes in farmers' practices towards agroecology. We posit that incentives should extend beyond economic values to include others intrinsic values of rice farming, such as cultural value, farmers’ wellbeing, food safety, etc. Value-based incentives should be discussed among stakeholders in dedicated adaptation spaces before they are implemented, otherwise they face the risk of not being implemented by so-called beneficiaries on the ground. These findings will feed future research about the future of rice farming in Cambodia as a stepping stone to co-design relevant incentive and intervention mechanisms towards sustainable rice practices.

Advancing the next-generation of global food system scenarios: a critical review of existing narratives

The recent global crises suggest that historic and current trends in the food system become less relevant when frequently disrupted by unexpected events, such as trade conflicts, the rise of inward-looking, right-wing governments, or another global pandemic. In the face of food insecurity, the foresight community is more strongly emphasizing the need to consider various plausible scenarios when preparing critical strategies within and around the intricate global food system. As scenarios have been developed for many decades, two questions arise: how is the food system community engaging in scenario planning, particularly given the urgent need for transformation coupled with current poly-crisis; and what is needed to enhance the process of scenario planning for the global food system? Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to critically review existing scenarios on global food systems, published by key organizations and authors in the last eight years, to identify common themes of plausible food system futures, the key uncertainties and emerging radical ideas. The paper is based on an inductive clustering framework that offers a method for evaluating the potential outcomes of varying governance structures and policy actions within scenario clusters across key dimensions—health and nutrition, livelihoods and equity, and climate and environment. The critical analysis of the scenario clusters leads to two important findings: (i) megatrends such as shifting demography, technology and consumption patterns are often central in reviewed scenario exercises, and radical notions have not significantly evolved but have taken on new dimensions; and (ii) while factors like consumption patterns, technology, and investment influence food systems significantly, governance structures play a crucial role in shaping the environment for these factors to interact. This underscores the importance of adaptive policymaking in responding to evolving uncertainties. This study provides a strong foundation for designing a next-generation global food system scenario exercise. It calls for a more ambitious, inclusive, and innovative approach for delving into a broader range of uncertainties, radical forces of change and prioritizing the interrogation of drivers related to geopolitical tensions, technological innovations, governance, social influences, and social inequalities.

All Library Entries

Latest Agroecology Experts

Sophal Kuy

Climate
Collaboration
Economy and income

Nguyen Thi Bich Ngoc

Water management
Equity
Natural resources governance
Supportive policies
Climate
Collaboration
Economy and income
Knowledge and values
Sustainable food system
Integrated systems
Input reduction and recycling

Jean-Christophe Castella

IRD
Thailand
Climate
Collaboration
Knowledge and values
Integrated systems

Sayvisène Boulom

NUoL
VIENTIANE
Nutrition and diets
Animal health
Sustainable food system
All Experts